artists_logo.gif Artist's Marketplacee
  Your interactive artists' community
Saturday, October 11, 2008 Register | Login
     
 
Artists Network
Subject: Projecting images for painting

You are not authorized to post a reply.   
Page 2 of 2 << < 12
Author Messages
erekson
Posts:5

12/05/2007 6:33 PM Alert 
Also called an lcd projector.  sorry meant to put that in previous post.
AllisonR
Posts:4

02/03/2008 6:24 AM Alert 
It depends on what you are using it for. The process of creating the art is one part, the actual art is another. I have small stream-of-consciousness doodles I make during boring work meetings. I use a crude zerox to blow them up by 1000-3000 percent. I then paint them. This is like projecting, but it is part of the creation to me. The roughness of the lines, so exagerated at that percent, with clear marking of the paper grain. Sometimes a projector can make a subject stiff and unnatural, sometimes it just helps cut down the time you are painting without loosing any quality or feeling, and sometimes it is actually an asset and improves on what you are doing.
FrankLeeding
Posts:11

03/21/2008 6:51 AM Alert 

talk about a "hornets nest" topic...

Plus and minus.

As my drawing 101 teacher "J-Lo" (Jennifer Locke)
sed: 
     What ever it takes to get what's
     in your head onto the paper/canvas"

If i need an exact picture of "The Thinker" by
Rodin then i'm using my trusty $49 projector.
Of course i do a lot of collage - which is
the ultimate "cheat".


There's a million ways to go. And you should try
them all. I've done *some* collaborative work as
well and for anything figurative Sandy does the
work - she teaches figure drawing. Me? I'm the
"abstract line specialist".

In the end, as i always say "You own your own lines".
The stroke might be from tracing paper, but YOU are
the one deciding where to put it and what to do with
it." Or as my art theory prof, David Newman sed

   Everything done since the Lasaux
   caves is derivative. (ie, a copy of style, etc)

He;s also very big on the xerox machine as camera.
Best ones are the old ones that DON'T have the
image correction stuff. Hard to duplicate (there's
that word again Warhol's ideas when the blamed
thing keeps colour/contrast correcting the image.

Anyway, *always* enjoy the battle of the words,

-- Frank    http://art-squeek.angelfire.com

*** ALSO on data projectors. rumour has it that Radio
    Shack is getting into the game and the price
will come down to something like $100 for a pop-up
style looking like the Polaroid SX-70 camera. I
noticed (last i priced them) that they *were* down.
Definitely a pricy but nice-to-have thing - esp
for (ahem, ehr..) performnace work.

tam

Posts:3

05/10/2008 7:58 PM Alert 

I actually have a very cheap projector that doesn't work very well.  It helps enough to get some basic shapes down, but I end up doing just as much drawing as if I hadn't used it.  I just don't do so much erasing in the beginning.  If I'm doing a portrait, I like to start with those basic dimensions in the right place or I'm erasing and starting quite a bit to make sure the likeness will be there in the end.  I'm kind of embarrassed that I use it, but for some things it seems necessary for times sake.

- tam

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2 << < 12

Forums > Join the Discussion > Tech Talk > Projecting images for painting



ActiveForums 3.6