Hi Michelle,
Although I am by no means an expert, I couldn't help but comment...I love the studies...the colors and shadows are absoutely beautiful.
Like you, I like the second composition, but the third is probably the most classically composed. By that I mean that in it you have set up the dark cools on the lower left played against the warm lights on the upper right. I do not agree that the path needs to be moved. As you have it the focal point (that intersection of the golden sector) is right where the path disappears. And the value differences are dramatic...the shadows versus the light filled upper right giving the impression that you are looking out of the shade into a glorious light-filled area.
So having critiqued #3, let me go on to why I like #2 and what you have done with it. Starting with the original color study... Here you have set up the cool darks on the lower right and the warm lights on the upper left...equally effective. But the transition is sharper...which I think makes it not as harmonious. I feel that mass at the right is too dark and so does not work as well as the dark on the left of #3. I would lighten it and perhaps the far shore of the lake should be lightened too if the light is coming from the upper right behind the viewer. The trouble I see with the composition is that I don't see a strong focal point. Obviously it is the red trees which do occupy the golden section. But the base of their trunks is just about the middle of the vertical distance...I guess I would move them down to the golden section corner. That would decrease the expanse of gray at the lower left as well.
So that brings me to the rework. I think you have the sky too dark now....I loved it in that clear blue of the original...definitely the sky color here in CT. You have now also lost some of the dramatic value differences in an attempt to harmonize. So now I don't feel that I am looking out of the shade into blazing autumn sunshine which I felt was a strong point of the original. So I guess I would vote to keep the brights of the original study but make the value change that I suggested.
The reason I wouldn't chose #1 is the lack of an interesting focus.
Well, bet you are sorry you asked for comments. I hope I haven't offended you. I do love the studies and think that either #2 or #3 will be great in a larger size.
Barbara
|